-
Authors: David Schindler, Tazin Hossain, Sascha Spors, Frank Krüger
Mean reproducibility score:
9.0/10
|
Number of reviews:
2
Why should we attempt to reproduce this paper?
We spend a lot of time to make our analyses reproducible. A review would allow us to collect some information on whether we are successful with it.
-
Authors: Jan N van Rijn and Frank Hutter
Mean reproducibility score:
7.0/10
|
Number of reviews:
1
Why should we attempt to reproduce this paper?
I tried hard to make this paper as reproducible as possible, but as techniques and dependencies become more complex, it is hard to make it 100% clear. Any form of feedback is more than welcome.
-
Authors: Atsushi Ebihara, Joel H. Nitta, Yurika Matsumoto, Yuri Fukazawa, Marie Kurihara, Hitomi Yokote, Kaoru Sakuma, Otowa Azakami, Yumiko Hirayama, Ryoko Imaichi
Mean reproducibility score:
10.0/10
|
Number of reviews:
1
Why should we attempt to reproduce this paper?
It uses the drake R package that should make reproducibility of R projects much easier (just run make.R and you're done). However, it does depend on very specific package versions, which are provided by the accompanying docker image.